Supporting Student Achievement
-
Overview
The top priority of the Blaine County School District is to improve student achievement for all students. Research shows that one of the most powerful ways to do this is for educators to implement a disciplined, collaborative process called professional learning communities (PLCs). To have the greatest impact, frequent, protected, district-wide collaboration time needs to be built into the school schedule.
Professional Learning Communities
-
What is a professional learning community?
A professional learning community is a group of educators who work together to improve their teaching practice and student achievement. PLCs focus on collective responsibility for student learning and ongoing professional development.
-
How are PLCs used to improve student achievement?
PLCs provide a forum for educators to share their knowledge and expertise, as well as to learn from each other. Through regular meetings and ongoing collaboration, PLCs can identify and address areas of weakness in student learning and implement evidence-based strategies to improve student achievement.
-
What are some common activities that take place within a PLC?
Common activities within a PLC include regular meetings, data analysis, lesson planning, collaborative problem-solving, and professional development.
-
How do PLCs differ from traditional professional development?
Traditional professional development is typically a one-time event or a series of isolated workshops. PLCs, on the other hand, involve ongoing collaboration and support.
Rather than simply providing information or training, PLCs create opportunities for educators to put new knowledge and skills into practice, reflect on their effectiveness, and make adjustments as needed.
-
Are PLCs only for teachers?
No, PLCs can include any education professional such as administrators, counselors, and support staff.
-
How can schools establish and maintain effective PLCs?
Establishing and maintaining effective PLCs requires strong leadership and clear expectations for participation and follow-through.
The school district should also provide the necessary resources and support, such as protected collaboration time, professional development, and technology, to ensure that PLCs can be successful.
-
What are the benefits of PLCs?
PLCs can lead to improved student achievement, increased teacher collaboration, and more effective use of resources. They also provide a space for teachers to share ideas, provide feedback, and learn from each other. PLCs can help teachers to stay current on best practices, improve their skills, and make data-driven decisions.
-
How can PLCs be implemented in schools?
PLCs can be implemented in schools through a variety of strategies, such as setting up regular meetings for teachers to collaborate and share ideas, providing professional development opportunities, and creating a culture of continuous improvement.
Additionally, it is important to have a clear vision, mission, and goal for PLCs, to designate a guiding coalition to lead the implementation, and to establish a culture of trust and respect.
-
What are some best practices for school boards to support PLCs?
Some best practices for school boards to support PLCs include providing resources and funding for PLCs, promoting a culture of continuous improvement, and providing professional development opportunities for teachers.
Additionally, the board should establish clear goals and expectations for PLCs, ensure that the school and district leadership is on board with the PLC initiative, and provide support and time for teacher collaboration.
The board should also establish clear evaluation and accountability measures to track the progress of PLCs and provide regular opportunities for PLC leaders to share successes and challenges.
Collective Teacher Efficacy
-
What is collective teacher efficacy?
Collective teacher efficacy is the belief of a group of educators that they can collectively make a positive impact on student learning. This belief is formed through collaboration and shared responsibility for student outcomes.
-
How are professional learning communities and collective teacher efficacy used to improve student achievement?
Professional learning communities and collective teacher efficacy work together to create a culture of continuous improvement in schools. PLCs provide a structure for educators to collaborate, share best practices, and set goals for student learning. Collective teacher efficacy helps to create a sense of shared responsibility for student outcomes, and can lead to increased motivation and engagement among educators.
Together, PLCs and collective teacher efficacy can help to improve student achievement by fostering a culture of continuous improvement, collaboration, and shared responsibility.
Collaboration Time
-
How can district-wide collaboration time for teachers improve student achievement?
District-wide collaboration time for teachers can improve student achievement by allowing teachers to share best practices, provide feedback, and work together to set goals for student learning. Collaboration time can also help to create a sense of shared responsibility for student outcomes, and can lead to increased motivation and engagement among educators. Additionally, during collaboration time, teachers can discuss the diverse needs of students and share strategies to address them which in turn can lead to more personalized and effective instruction.
Collaboration time can also provide opportunities for teachers to work on developing and aligning curriculum, assessments, and lesson plans which can lead to more effective instruction and higher student achievement.
-
Is common collaboration time intended to reduce instructional time with students?
No, time scheduled for common collaboration will be made up by extending the school schedule later on other days and will not reduce overall instructional time.
-
What are the benefits of district-wide collaboration time for teachers?
District-wide collaboration time for teachers can lead to improved student achievement, increased teacher collaboration, and more effective use of resources. Teachers can also share ideas, provide feedback, and learn from each other, stay current on best practices, improve their skills, and make data-driven decisions.
-
How can district-wide collaboration time be implemented?
District-wide collaboration time can be implemented by scheduling frequent, protected time for regular meetings where teachers collaborate and share ideas. It is also important to provide professional development opportunities and create a culture of continuous improvement.
District-wide collaboration time provides opportunities for both horizontal and vertical alignment of curriculum (see explanation below under Organization of PLCs).. It is important to have a clear vision, mission, and goal for collaboration time.
Data Assessment & Decision Making
-
How do PLCs assess data to impact student achievement?
PLCs use data to assess student achievement and identify areas where students are struggling or excelling. The data can be collected from a variety of sources, such as standardized test scores, formative assessments, or student work samples.
PLCs analyze the data to identify patterns and trends, and to make informed decisions about instruction. They use data to set goals, monitor progress, and adjust instruction as needed.
PLCs also use data to identify individual student needs and to create targeted interventions to support those needs.
-
How do PLCs use the data to make decisions and act on them?
PLCs use data to make decisions about instruction and to determine what changes need to be made to improve student learning. They meet regularly to review data, reflect on their practice and make decisions on how to better support student learning. PLCs also use data to set goals for student learning and track progress toward those goals. They may also use data to identify student subgroups and create targeted interventions for those students. PLCs also use data to evaluate the effectiveness of their interventions and make adjustments as needed.
Additionally, PLCs use data to identify and share best practices, which can be used to improve instruction across the school or district.
-
What are intervention and extension activities planned by PLCs?
Intervention activities are targeted strategies and programs designed to support students who are struggling academically. These activities can include small-group instruction, additional support for students with special needs, and differentiated instruction. The goal of intervention activities is to help struggling students catch up to their peers and achieve success in the classroom. Extension activities are designed to challenge and extend the learning of students who are already performing at or above grade level. These activities can include enrichment activities, independent study projects, and advanced coursework.
The goal of extension activities is to provide opportunities for high-achieving students to continue to grow and develop their skills and knowledge.
-
Why are intervention and extension activities important?
Intervention and extension activities are important because they allow PLCs to address the diverse needs of students. By providing targeted support and enrichment opportunities, PLCs can ensure that all students are receiving the support they need to succeed.
-
How are intervention and extension activities planned by PLCs?
PLCs use data to identify student needs and develop strategies to address them. They also collaborate to align instruction with the curriculum, and to create and share resources. PLCs regularly meet to discuss student progress and make decisions on how to support all learners.
-
Will the specific activities and strategies chosen by PLCs be the same for every school?
No, the specific activities and strategies chosen by PLCs will vary depending on the unique needs of the school and student population.
Organization of PLCs
-
Which teachers work together in PLCs?
PLCs typically consist of teachers from the same grade level or subject area who work together to improve their teaching practice and student achievement. For example, a PLC might consist of all the third-grade teachers in a school or district, or all the high school math teachers in a district.
PLCs can also include other school staff members such as instructional coaches, librarians, counselors, or special education teachers.
-
What is horizontal alignment in teaching?
Horizontal alignment in teaching refers to the alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessments within a grade level. This means that the content and skills taught in different subjects or classes within a grade level are aligned and connected, so that students are able to make connections across subjects and see the relevance of what they are learning.
This type of alignment helps to ensure that students across the district are receiving a comprehensive and cohesive education within a grade level.
-
What is vertical alignment in teaching?
Vertical alignment in teaching refers to the alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessments across grade levels. This means that the content and skills taught in one grade level build upon the content and skills taught in the previous grade level, and prepare students for the content and skills they will learn in the next grade level.
This type of alignment ensures that students are building a solid foundation of knowledge and skills over time, and that they are well-prepared for the next level of learning.
-
How can PLCs support vertical and horizontal alignment?
PLCs can support vertical and horizontal alignment by creating opportunities for teachers to collaborate and share best practices across grade levels and subjects. By working together, teachers can ensure that the curriculum, instruction, and assessments are aligned and connected across grade levels and subjects. PLCs can also provide opportunities for teachers to analyze student data and make data-driven decisions about instruction, which can help to ensure that students are receiving the support they need to succeed.
Additionally, PLCs can help to create a culture of continuous improvement, in which teachers are continuously reflecting on and refining their practice to better meet the needs of their students.
Research
-
There is a significant body of research that supports the idea that teachers working together collaboratively in professional learning communities can lead to improved student achievement. Some examples of research studies include:
- Harvard research paper on professional learning communities: https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/gse-projectngt/files/johnson_et_al_teams_revised_062916.pdf.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on student achievement: A case study" by Richard DuFour and Robert Eaker. This study, published in the Journal of Staff Development in 2000, found that PLCs had a positive impact on student achievement.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student achievement" by Stephanie Hirsh and Mark Sturgis, which found that PLCs have a positive impact on both teaching practice and student achievement.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on student achievement: evidence from North Carolina" by Robert E. Floden and others, which found that PLCs are positively associated with student achievement.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on student achievement: a meta-analysis of design and implementation features" by Robert E. Floden and others, which found that PLCs have a positive impact on student achievement.
- "Teacher collaboration and professional learning communities in schools" by D. Jean Clandinin and others, which found that PLCs can lead to improved teacher practice and student achievement.
- "Collective teacher efficacy and student achievement: An investigation of causal ordering" by Charles T. Lindsey and J. David Warren, which found that CTE is positively related to student achievement.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on student achievement: A meta-analysis" by Richard DuFour and Robert Eaker. This study, published in the Journal of Educational Research in 1998, found that PLCs had a positive impact on student achievement.
- "The effects of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning" by Sharon Feiman-Nemser. This study, published in the Teachers College Record in 2001, found that PLCs can lead to improved teaching practice and increased student learning.
- "The impact of professional learning communities on mathematics teaching and learning" by Jane Westberg, et al. This study, published in the Journal of Educational Psychology in 2010, found that PLCs can have a positive impact on mathematics teaching and learning.
- "Professional learning communities and student achievement: An analysis of the relationship" by Anthony Bryk and Barbara Schneider. This study, published in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis in 2002, found a positive relationship between PLCs and student achievement.